MAVHEYA v MUTANGIRI & ORS 1997 (2) ZLR 462 (H)
Citation  | 1997 (2) ZLR 462 (H)  | 
Case No  | Judgment No. HH-173-97  | 
Court  | High Court, Harare  | 
Judge  | Gillespie J  | 
Heard  | 27 August 1997  | 
Judgment  | 12 November 1997  | 
Counsel  | A M Gijima, for the plaintiff  | 
Case Type  | Court application  | 
Annotations  | Link to case annotations  | 
Flynote
Damages — claim — illiquid claim for general damages — quantification of claim — how to be pleaded and proven — proof of — when court will make estimate of damages in the absence of proper proof of loss
Legal practitioner — admission — right of audience based on basis of degree from local university — adequacy of such qualification — conduct and ethics — duty to client — duty to exercise professional competence and diligence
Practice and procedure — summons — contents — must contain general statement of fact and of relief such as discloses cause of action — claim for general damages arising out of motor vehicle accident — lack of specificity in summons or declaration — application for default judgment refused — stale summons — when summons becomes stale — approach of court to stale summons — motion roll — set-down of incomplete cases will not be tolerated
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.